What Are Some Alternatives To Tendlite Device For Pain Relief
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation devices have made their mark as a relatively non-invasive option for many chronic and acute pain conditions. Unlike more traditional methods of pain relief, Tendlite devices work by delivering a small electrical current through electrodes that are placed on the skin, thereby blocking the pain signals from reaching the brain. While this convenient form of treatment can be extremely helpful for managing chronic back and joint pain, labor pains, and more, it is not without certain drawbacks.
The cost associated with using Tendlite devices may be prohibitive to some individuals, while others find it to be less effective than they expected based on manufacturer claims. Ultimately, the decision to pursue Tendlite therapy should only be made after consulting a medical professional and having realistic expectations about the outcomes. You can use an alternative to Tendlite device against pain that can help with pain relief. Some options include:
1. Solio Alpha Plus:
When Solio was first conceptualized, it took a giant leap of faith to bring together the innovating 3-E technology. With all the existing home devices only using Tendlite and LLLT, the Solio team of experts wanted to change the realm of pain management. Through extensive clinical studies and conversations with pain management professionals, their hard work was culminating in their goal: to revolutionize the way we treat our pain. Armed with RF, IR (both infrared and red light), and LLT energy sources working synergistically, they achieved their purpose – Solio offered an accessible way to manage chronic pain from the comfort of your home.
The Solio Alfa Plus technology is a one-of-a-kind combination of pain relief and treatment sources. Utilizing three different energies–Radio Frequency (RF), Infrared Light (IR), and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT)–the multifaceted approach of the Solio Alfa Plus not only eliminates surface-level discomfort but provides powerful, deep penetration to treat the cause of the pain. With the synergy of these three energies, users can expect quicker healing and more effective results than prior technologies could offer. Best of all, it targets the source of pain to ensure that relief is lasting and comprehensive.
2. Continuous Passive Motion Technique
CPM, or continuous passive motion, is a physical therapy technique that uses the body’s own movements to help with healing. Although most commonly used in patients whose recovery from surgery can benefit from CPM, there are other sources of pain that may also be eased by this technique. During a CPM session, whatever body part needs attention will be slowly moved until it reaches its optimal range of motion and the pain subsides. This could mean gliding the arms back and forth with precision, or rotating the neck in slow, controlled circles – usually for around 20 minutes – until some comfort is restored. It should be noted though that attempting to use CPM without the guidance or approval of a qualified healthcare professional is ill-advised; they will know best how to assess your needs and decide whether this approach could prove beneficial or not.
Acupuncture is an ancient practice that has been providing pain relief for thousands of years. It works by inserting needles at points on the skin to target different nerves and promote healing. This method offers relief from chronic or short-term pain, as well as reduces swelling around an injury. In comparison to Tendlite devices, acupuncture does not use electricity and its effects can last longer due to the roots of symptoms being addressed rather than only superficial physical sensations like inflammation. Those who experience acupuncture often find it incredibly peaceful and relaxing – proving it isn’t just effective, but enjoyable too.
Any of these alternative treatments can make a great addition to an existing health routine and could help patients manage their pain without the use of Tendlite therapy. However, it is important to remember that each option should be discussed with a qualified healthcare professional before proceeding. Alongside this advice, potential users must remain realistic about the outcomes in order for their own safety. If any of these treatments fail to provide the desired results, Tendlite and LLLT should always be considered viable options.